<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Before you make a PDF file, Read: Preflight- a brief history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markzware.com/blogs/before-you-pdf-a-file-preflight-a-brief-history/2008/05/15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markzware.com/blogs/before-you-pdf-a-file-preflight-a-brief-history/2008/05/15/</link>
	<description>File Preflight, Layout Conversion and Data Recovery for graphic designers, publishers, prepress operators and printers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:21:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: If Content is King, than Content Conversion is the Prince</title>
		<link>http://www.markzware.com/blogs/before-you-pdf-a-file-preflight-a-brief-history/2008/05/15/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>If Content is King, than Content Conversion is the Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markzware.com/blogs/?p=70#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>[...] Quark, Microsoft, Corel and others all have their various proprietary file formats. Some, like PDF, may be more open than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quark, Microsoft, Corel and others all have their various proprietary file formats. Some, like PDF, may be more open than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desktop Publishing (DTP) alternatives to Adobe InDesign and QuarkXPress</title>
		<link>http://www.markzware.com/blogs/before-you-pdf-a-file-preflight-a-brief-history/2008/05/15/comment-page-1/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Desktop Publishing (DTP) alternatives to Adobe InDesign and QuarkXPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markzware.com/blogs/?p=70#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>[...] probably recognize this class of software I’m reviewing now as Desktop Publishing (DTP). Page layout tools allow a designer to arrange artwork, photography and type into a meaningful and attractive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] probably recognize this class of software I’m reviewing now as Desktop Publishing (DTP). Page layout tools allow a designer to arrange artwork, photography and type into a meaningful and attractive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Color managment and soft proofing &#124; Markzware</title>
		<link>http://www.markzware.com/blogs/before-you-pdf-a-file-preflight-a-brief-history/2008/05/15/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Color managment and soft proofing &#124; Markzware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markzware.com/blogs/?p=70#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>[...] Preflight has long been a task much associated with color management and soft proofing. Here we see the 3rd of John Nate’s color management case studies via News &amp; Tech. Electronic preflighting can catch many errors and unwanted quality issues on outputted plates and thus the final printed piece, yet there are many things that only a soft proof and proper color management can find for you. For instance typical design errors, where a text box is hidden, partial or fully, behind a placed image. It is important to take your InDesign, Illustrator or Quark document and to do a &#8220;export as PDF&#8221; and make a proper soft proof and in many cases even a hard proof under the correct lighting conditions. Here is how John starts his informative piece: In part two of this series, we explored the finer points of monitor calibration. Before moving on to the finer points of soft proofing, let’s review the monitor calibration procedure. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Preflight has long been a task much associated with color management and soft proofing. Here we see the 3rd of John Nate’s color management case studies via News &amp; Tech. Electronic preflighting can catch many errors and unwanted quality issues on outputted plates and thus the final printed piece, yet there are many things that only a soft proof and proper color management can find for you. For instance typical design errors, where a text box is hidden, partial or fully, behind a placed image. It is important to take your InDesign, Illustrator or Quark document and to do a &#8220;export as PDF&#8221; and make a proper soft proof and in many cases even a hard proof under the correct lighting conditions. Here is how John starts his informative piece: In part two of this series, we explored the finer points of monitor calibration. Before moving on to the finer points of soft proofing, let’s review the monitor calibration procedure. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InDesign has Live Preflighting; do I still need FlightCheck? &#124; Markzware</title>
		<link>http://www.markzware.com/blogs/before-you-pdf-a-file-preflight-a-brief-history/2008/05/15/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>InDesign has Live Preflighting; do I still need FlightCheck? &#124; Markzware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markzware.com/blogs/?p=70#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>[...] the preflight inventors, U.S. Patented holders and with more than 14 years of experience, Markzware is in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the preflight inventors, U.S. Patented holders and with more than 14 years of experience, Markzware is in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
